Abstract
Background & Aim: Antiviral therapy has greatly improved the outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and active liver disease or advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis. However, current treatment does not eradicate HBV and long-term treatment is needed in most patients to maintain clinical benefit. Thus, professional society guidelines do not recommend treatment of all patients with chronic HBV infection. This review article will examine evidence for and against expansion of treatment to patients in whom treatment is not recommended based on current guidelines. Results: Available data support expanding treatment to immune tolerant patients and patients in the grey zones who have evidence of active/advanced liver disease based on liver biopsy or non-invasive tests and those who remain in the immune tolerant phase after age 40. Evidence supporting treatment expansion to confirmed inactive carriers and other immune tolerant patients is lacking. Conclusions: HBV treatment indications can be more liberal when new therapies that can achieve HBsAg loss safely in a high percentage of patients after a finite course of treatment are available.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2006-2014 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 10 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 AGA Institute
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Antiviral Therapy
- Guidelines
- Immune Tolerant
- Inactive Carrier
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Should Treatment Indications for Chronic Hepatitis B Be Expanded?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver