Silver cofirability differences between Bi1.5Zn0.92Nb1.5O6.92 and Zn3Nb2O8

M. C. Wu, Y. C. Huang, W. F. Su*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

We have investigated systematically the differences of silver cofirability and microwave dielectric properties between Zn3Nb2O8 and Bi1.5Zn0.92Nb1.5O6.92 (BZN). Two type dopants: 0.29BaCO3-0.71CuO (BC) and 0.81MoO3-0.19CuO (MC) were used in Zn3Nb2O8 and Bi1.5Zn0.92Nb1.5O6.92 ceramics so they can be cofired with silver. The BC-doped ceramics in general have better dielectric properties than those of MC-doped ceramics. The BC-doped Zn3Nb2O8 exhibits better dielectric properties than those of BC-doped BZN (k = 14.7, Q × f = 8200 GHz versus k = 120.1, Q × f = 1050 GHz). For silver compatibility study, the interfacial behaviors between microwave dielectric materials and silver were investigated by using X-ray diffractometer, scanning electronic microscope, and electronic probe microanalyzer. No new crystalline phase and no silver migration behavior were found in the BC-doped Zn3Nb2O8 ceramics cofired with silver, but slight silver migration was detected for BC-doped BZN. But slight silver migration was detected for MC-doped Zn3Nb2O8 and BZN ceramics cofired with silver. Therefore, the good overall properties of BC-doped Zn3Nb2O8 are suitable for microwave applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3017-3021
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the European Ceramic Society
Volume27
Issue number8-9 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Dielectric properties
  • Microstructure
  • Powders-solid state reaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Silver cofirability differences between Bi1.5Zn0.92Nb1.5O6.92 and Zn3Nb2O8'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this