Similar efficacy and safety between lenvatinib versus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Chung Wei Su, Wei Teng, Po Ting Lin, Wen Juei Jeng, Kuei An Chen, Yi Chung Hsieh, Wei Ting Chen, Ming Mo Ho, Chia Hsun Hsieh, Ching Ting Wang, Pei Mei Chai, Chen Chun Lin*, Chun Yen Lin*, Shi Ming Lin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab(A + B) have been used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as first-line therapy. Real-world studies comparison of efficacy and safety in these two regimens are limited, we therefore conduct this study to investigate these issues. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients received lenvatinib (n = 46) and A + B (n = 46) as first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC in a tertiary medical center. Objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed for baseline clinical features balance. Results: A total of 92 patients with median age of 63.8 year-old, 78.3% male, 85.9% viral hepatitis infected, 67.4% BCLC stage C were enrolled. The median treatment and follow-up duration were 4.7 months and 9.4 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in ORR (26.1% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.1226), PFS (5.9 vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.4066), and OS (not reached vs. not reached, p = 0.7128) between the lenvatinib and A + B groups. After IPW, the results of survival and response rate were also compared. Subgroup analysis suggested that using lenvatinib was not inferior to A + B in regards of PFS, including those with elder, Child-Pugh class B, beyond up-to-seven, or portal vein invasion VP4 patients. Among the lenvatinib treated patients, multivariate analysis showed patients elder than 65-year-old was an independent predictor associated with shorter PFS (adjust HR: 2.085[0.914–4.753], p = 0.0213). The incidence rates of adverse events were similar between two groups (76 vs. 63%, p = 0.1740). Both of two regimens had similarly few impact on liver function by comparison of baseline, third month, and sixth month albumin-bilirubin index and Child-Pugh score. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib are similar to A + B as a first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7077-7089
Number of pages13
JournalCancer Medicine
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 03 2023

Bibliographical note

© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • adverse event
  • atezolizumab plus bevacizumab
  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • lenvatinib
  • survival
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy
  • Bevacizumab/adverse effects
  • Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Female
  • Aged
  • Retrospective Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Similar efficacy and safety between lenvatinib versus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this