Spironolactone and the risk of urinary tract cancer in patients with hypertension: A nationwide populationbased retrospective case-control study

Ya Wen Chuang, Mei Ching Yu, Shih Ting Huang, Cheng Kuang Yang, Cheng Hsu Chen, Ying Chih Lo, Cheng Li Lin, Kuo Hsiung Shu, Tung Min Yu, Chia Hung Kao*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: This was a nationwide study by National Health Insurance Research Database to investigate the risk of urinary tract cancers (UTCs) for renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors including spironolactone. Methods: A total of 32 167 UTC patients with hypertension were enrolled in the National Health Insurance program between 2005 and 2011. Results: Among different subclasses of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for UTC risk was 1.00 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96-1.04] in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, 1.22 (95% CI = 1.18-1.26) in patients who received angiotensin II receptor blockers, 0.91 (95% CI = 0.87-0.96) in spironolactone. Spironolactone is associated with a significantly lower risk of prostate cancer (adjusted OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.82-0.94) in the male patients. A similar trend was observed in the female patients for the risk of bladder cancer (adjusted OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.72-0.92). Conclusion: Our findings show that a lower risk of UTCs significantly associated with spironolactone in patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-177
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Hypertension
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • National Health Insurance Research Database
  • Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system
  • Spironolactone
  • Urinary tract cancers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spironolactone and the risk of urinary tract cancer in patients with hypertension: A nationwide populationbased retrospective case-control study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this