Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Tegafur–Uracil/Leucovorin Plus Oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX) as Consolidation Regimen after Short-Course Radiotherapy Is Effective for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

  • Chun Kai Liao
  • , Ya Ting Kuo
  • , Yih Jong Chern
  • , Yu Jen Hsu
  • , Yueh Chen Lin
  • , Yen Lin Yu
  • , Pao Shiu Hsieh
  • , Jy Ming Chiang
  • , Chien Yuh Yeh
  • , Jeng Fu You*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Colorectal Section
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Chang Gung University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant SCRT and tegafur– uracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX) for LARC in comparison to those of the modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX-6) regimen. We retrospectively evaluated 15 and 22 patients with LARC who underwent SCRT, followed by consolidation chemotherapy with TEGAFOX and mFOLFOX-6 before surgery, respectively, between January 2015 and December 2019. The primary endpoint was the tumor response rate. The secondary endpoints were compliance, toxicity, complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). The dose reduction rate was lower in the TEGAFOX group (0 vs. 9.1% (n = 2)). No grade III-IV toxicities occurred in the TEGAFOX group. Two and four patients in the TEGAFOX and mFOLFOX-6 groups, respectively, achieved clinical complete responses. The pathologic complete response rate was lower in the TEGAFOX group (7.7% vs. 17.6%). Overall, 11 (73.3%) and 17 (81.0%) patients had a neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score of <16 in the TEGAFOX and mFOLFOX-6 groups, respectively. All patients in this study received sphincter-preservation surgery. One patient in each group developed Clavien– Dindo grade III complications. There were no significant between-group differences in the 3-year OS (81.8% vs. 84.8%, p = 0.884) and 3-year DFS (72% vs. 71.6%, p = 0.824) rates. TEGAFOX, as consolidation chemotherapy after SCRT, achieves good tumor downstaging and patient compliance in LARC. The toxicity, complications, and surgical outcomes are similar to those of mFOLFOX-6. Thus, TEGAFOX can be considered a chemotherapy option for rectal cancer treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2920
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume11
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 05 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • consolidation chemotherapy
  • FOLFOX
  • locally advanced rectal cancer
  • neoadjuvant rectal score
  • short-course radiotherapy
  • TEGAFOX

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tegafur–Uracil/Leucovorin Plus Oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX) as Consolidation Regimen after Short-Course Radiotherapy Is Effective for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this