The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process

John S. Gero, Hsien Hui Tang

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

90 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper presents the results of studying a single designer using protocol analyses and examines the implications of the results on studies of design thinking. It contrasts two types of protocols: concurrent protocols and retrospective protocols. The results indicate that concurrent and retrospective protocols both produce very similar outcomes in terms of exploring the process-oriented aspects of designing. As a result, it is argued there is no associated interference with the ongoing design process when using concurrent protocols.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-295
Number of pages13
JournalDesign Studies
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 05 2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Case study
  • Design cognition
  • Protocol studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this