TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of 1-stage versus 2-stage palate repair on facial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate
T2 - A review
AU - Yang, I. Y.
AU - Liao, Y. F.
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effect of 1-stage versus 2-stage palate repair with delayed hard palate closure on facial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate. A literature survey from the PubMed database from January 1966 to December 2007 used the medical subject headings terms 'facial growth', 'cleft lip and palate', 'cephalometry', and '1-stage palate repair' in combination with '2-stage palate repair' or 'delayed hard palate closure'. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal from 1964 to November 2007 was hand searched. Controlled studies written in English were selected. Two reviewers selected and extracted the data independently and assessed the quality of the studies. On the basis of this search only nine studies were included in this review. All studies were retrospective and non-randomized. Six studies were cross-sectional, and three were longitudinal. Heterogeneity and methodological deficiencies in the studies prevented conclusions regarding stage of palate repair and facial growth. Further well-designed controlled studies and long-term studies are needed, and researchers should focus on the variation in hard palate repair timing before 3 years of age and consider patient speech.
AB - The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effect of 1-stage versus 2-stage palate repair with delayed hard palate closure on facial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate. A literature survey from the PubMed database from January 1966 to December 2007 used the medical subject headings terms 'facial growth', 'cleft lip and palate', 'cephalometry', and '1-stage palate repair' in combination with '2-stage palate repair' or 'delayed hard palate closure'. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal from 1964 to November 2007 was hand searched. Controlled studies written in English were selected. Two reviewers selected and extracted the data independently and assessed the quality of the studies. On the basis of this search only nine studies were included in this review. All studies were retrospective and non-randomized. Six studies were cross-sectional, and three were longitudinal. Heterogeneity and methodological deficiencies in the studies prevented conclusions regarding stage of palate repair and facial growth. Further well-designed controlled studies and long-term studies are needed, and researchers should focus on the variation in hard palate repair timing before 3 years of age and consider patient speech.
KW - cephalometry
KW - cleft lip and palate
KW - delayed hard palate closure
KW - facial growth
KW - stage of palate repair
KW - two-stage palate repair
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957367708&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.04.053
DO - 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.04.053
M3 - 文献综述
C2 - 20637567
AN - SCOPUS:77957367708
SN - 0901-5027
VL - 39
SP - 945
EP - 950
JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 10
ER -