The effects of heated humidifier in continuous positive airway pressure titration

Chung Chieh Yu, Cheng Ming Luo, Yu Chih Liu, Huang Pin Wu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that routine heated humidifier (HH) do not provide any benefit during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration if there are no significant naso-pharyngeal symptoms. In clinical practice, nasal diseases and upper airway symptoms are very common. This study investigates the effects of HH during CPAP titration in subjects with or without naso-pharyngeal symptoms. Methods: Fifty-two patients who received polysomnography with CPAP titration were randomly assigned to HH and non-HH groups. Their nasal cavity, pharynx, and naso-pharynx were evaluated before CPAP titration, and a questionnaire on subjective sensation, including naso-pharyngeal symptoms, willingness to further use CPAP, and sleep improvement, was used. Objective (e.g., leak, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) reduction, and optimal CPAP pressure level) and subjective data were analyzed between the two groups. Results: In subjective sensation, the HH group did not have any benefit in further willingness to use CPAP and in sleep improvement, but had improved naso-pharyngeal symptoms (p = 0.043). There were no significant differences in leak, AHI reduction, and optimal CPAP pressure, even in patients with significant naso-pharyngeal symptoms. Conclusion: Routine use of HH is not necessary during CPAP titration regardless of naso-pharyngeal symptoms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-138
Number of pages6
JournalSleep and Breathing
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 03 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration
  • Humidifier
  • Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of heated humidifier in continuous positive airway pressure titration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this