TY - JOUR
T1 - The local addition of tenoxicam reduces the incidence of low back pain after lumbar epidural anesthesia
AU - Wang, Yung Liang
AU - Hsieh, Jing Ru
AU - Chung, Ham See
AU - Yu, Chi Lun
AU - Ho, Angie C.Y.
AU - Lu, Pao Ping
AU - Tan, Peter P.C.
PY - 1998/12
Y1 - 1998/12
N2 - Background: Postepidural backache is a common postoperative complaint after lumbar epidural anesthesia. Useful interventions to decrease the incidence of postepidural backache would be helpful. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the effect of local addition of tenoxicam on the incidence of postepidural backache after nonobstetric surgery. One thousand unpremedicated ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy were assigned randomly to tenoxicam or control groups. Patients in the control group received 25 ml lidocaine, 2%, with epinephrine 1:200,000 epidurally and 4 ml lidocaine, 1%, for local skin infiltration. Patients in the tenoxicam group received 25 ml lidocaine, 2%, with epinephrine 1:200,000 epidurally and 4 ml lidocaine, 1%, with tenoxicam (2 mg) 1:2,000 for local skin infiltration. Patients were interviewed at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using a standard visual analog scale for evaluation of postepidural backache. A patient was considered to have postepidural backache when the postoperative visual analog scale score was higher than the preoperative score. Results: The incidence of postepidural backache in patients in the control group for the 3 days were 22.8%, 17.4%, and 9.2%, all of which were significantly more frequent than observed in the patients in the tenoxicam group (6.8%, 4.0%, and 1.2%, P < 0.01). There was a significant association between backache and multiple attempts at epidural needle insertion. Conclusion: In summary, the local addition of tenoxicam reduced the incidence and severity of postepidural backache.
AB - Background: Postepidural backache is a common postoperative complaint after lumbar epidural anesthesia. Useful interventions to decrease the incidence of postepidural backache would be helpful. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the effect of local addition of tenoxicam on the incidence of postepidural backache after nonobstetric surgery. One thousand unpremedicated ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy were assigned randomly to tenoxicam or control groups. Patients in the control group received 25 ml lidocaine, 2%, with epinephrine 1:200,000 epidurally and 4 ml lidocaine, 1%, for local skin infiltration. Patients in the tenoxicam group received 25 ml lidocaine, 2%, with epinephrine 1:200,000 epidurally and 4 ml lidocaine, 1%, with tenoxicam (2 mg) 1:2,000 for local skin infiltration. Patients were interviewed at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using a standard visual analog scale for evaluation of postepidural backache. A patient was considered to have postepidural backache when the postoperative visual analog scale score was higher than the preoperative score. Results: The incidence of postepidural backache in patients in the control group for the 3 days were 22.8%, 17.4%, and 9.2%, all of which were significantly more frequent than observed in the patients in the tenoxicam group (6.8%, 4.0%, and 1.2%, P < 0.01). There was a significant association between backache and multiple attempts at epidural needle insertion. Conclusion: In summary, the local addition of tenoxicam reduced the incidence and severity of postepidural backache.
KW - Centroneuraxial blockade
KW - Hemorrhoidectomy
KW - Secondary backache
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032434257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00019
DO - 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00019
M3 - 文章
C2 - 9856716
AN - SCOPUS:0032434257
SN - 0003-3022
VL - 89
SP - 1414
EP - 1417
JO - Anesthesiology
JF - Anesthesiology
IS - 6
ER -