The significance of transfusion in the past as a risk for current hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection: A study in endoscopy patients

  • Hani M. Tawk
  • , Karen Vickery
  • , Linda Bisset
  • , Sing Kai Lo
  • , Yvonne E. Cossart*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the contribution of transfusion in the past to the risk of current infection with hepatitis B or C among patients attending a large hospital for endoscopic procedures. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood samples had been tested for hepatitis markers by routine methods. Patients completed a comprehensive risk factor questionnaire and results were analyzed using computer software. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of the 2120 participants in the study received transfusions in the past. There was no increase in prevalence of hepatitis B among those transfused. Compared with nontransfused participants, recipients of blood before the implementation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening in 1990 had a 4.6-fold increased risk of HCV infection, whereas those transfused with screened blood had a 3-fold increased risk. The difference between the odds ratios for patients before and after screening was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Because screening has almost completely eliminated HCV from the blood supply, our finding of a continuing association of HCV infection with transfusion was unexpected. It implies that there are significant other nosocomial risks for hepatitis C transmission associated with the clinical situations where patients received blood. These should be actively investigated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)807-813
Number of pages7
JournalTransfusion
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 05 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The significance of transfusion in the past as a risk for current hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection: A study in endoscopy patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this