TY - JOUR
T1 - The test-retest reliability of the respiratory-related evoked potential
AU - Herzog, Michaela
AU - Sucec, Josef
AU - Jelinčić, Valentina
AU - Van Diest, Ilse
AU - Van den Bergh, Omer
AU - Chan, Pei Ying S.
AU - Davenport, Paul
AU - von Leupoldt, Andreas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - The respiratory-related evoked potential (RREP) is an established technique to study the neural processing of respiratory sensations. We examined the test-retest reliability of the RREP during an unloaded baseline condition (no dyspnea) and an inspiratory resistive loaded breathing condition (dyspnea) over a one-week period. RREPs were evoked by short inspiratory occlusions (150 ms) while EEG was continuously measured. The mean amplitudes of the RREP components Nf, P1, N1, P2, and P3 were studied. For the no dyspnea condition, moderate test-retest reliability for Nf (intraclass correlation coefficient ICC: 0.73) and P1 (ICC: 0.74), good test-retest reliability for N1 (ICC: 0.89) and P3 (ICC: 0.76), and excellent test-retest reliability for P2 (ICC: 0.92) was demonstrated. For the dyspnea condition, moderate test-retest reliability was found for Nf (ICC: 0.69) and P1 (ICC: 0.57) and good test-retest reliability for N1 (ICC: 0.77), P2 (ICC: 0.84), and P3 (ICC: 0.77). This indicates that the RREP components Nf, P1, N1, P2, and P3, elicited by inspiratory occlusions, show adequate reliability in a test-retest study design with or without parallel sustained resistive load-induced dyspnea.
AB - The respiratory-related evoked potential (RREP) is an established technique to study the neural processing of respiratory sensations. We examined the test-retest reliability of the RREP during an unloaded baseline condition (no dyspnea) and an inspiratory resistive loaded breathing condition (dyspnea) over a one-week period. RREPs were evoked by short inspiratory occlusions (150 ms) while EEG was continuously measured. The mean amplitudes of the RREP components Nf, P1, N1, P2, and P3 were studied. For the no dyspnea condition, moderate test-retest reliability for Nf (intraclass correlation coefficient ICC: 0.73) and P1 (ICC: 0.74), good test-retest reliability for N1 (ICC: 0.89) and P3 (ICC: 0.76), and excellent test-retest reliability for P2 (ICC: 0.92) was demonstrated. For the dyspnea condition, moderate test-retest reliability was found for Nf (ICC: 0.69) and P1 (ICC: 0.57) and good test-retest reliability for N1 (ICC: 0.77), P2 (ICC: 0.84), and P3 (ICC: 0.77). This indicates that the RREP components Nf, P1, N1, P2, and P3, elicited by inspiratory occlusions, show adequate reliability in a test-retest study design with or without parallel sustained resistive load-induced dyspnea.
KW - Breathlessness
KW - Dyspnea
KW - EEG
KW - Respiratory-related evoked potentials
KW - Test-retest reliability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107988689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108133
DO - 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108133
M3 - 文献综述
C2 - 34118356
AN - SCOPUS:85107988689
SN - 0301-0511
VL - 163
JO - Biological Psychology
JF - Biological Psychology
M1 - 108133
ER -