TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation
T2 - A cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system
AU - Kuo, Spencer C.H.
AU - Kuo, Pao Jen
AU - Hsu, Shiun Yuan
AU - Rau, Cheng Shyuan
AU - Chen, Yi Chun
AU - Hsieh, Hsiao Yun
AU - Hsieh, Ching Hua
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Objectives: The presentation of decrease blood pressure with tachycardia is usually an indicator of significant blood loss. In this study, we used the reverse shock index (RSI), a ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), to evaluate the haemodynamic status of trauma patients. As an SBP lower than the HR (RSI<1) may indicate haemodynamic instability, the objective of this study was to assess whether RSI<1 can help to identify highrisk patients with potential shock and poor outcome, even though these patients do not yet meet the criteria for multidisciplinary trauma team activation (TTA). Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Taiwan. Participants: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 20 106 patients obtained from the trauma registry system of a level I trauma centre for trauma admissions from January 2009 through December 2014. Patients for whom a trauma team was not activated (regular patients) and who had RSI<1 were compared with regular patients with RSI=1. The ORs of the associated conditions and injuries were calculated with 95% CIs. Main outcome measures: In-hospital mortality. Results: Among regular patients with RSI<1, significantly more patients had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) =25 (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.62; p<0.001) and the mortality rate was also higher (2.1% vs 0.5%; OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.10 to 7.08; p<0.001) than in regular patients with RSI=1. The intensive care unit length of stay was longer in regular patients with RSI<1 than in regular patients with RSI=1. Conclusions: Among patients who did not reach the criteria for TTA, RSI<1 indicates a potentially worse outcome and a requirement for more attention and aggressive care in the emergency department.
AB - Objectives: The presentation of decrease blood pressure with tachycardia is usually an indicator of significant blood loss. In this study, we used the reverse shock index (RSI), a ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), to evaluate the haemodynamic status of trauma patients. As an SBP lower than the HR (RSI<1) may indicate haemodynamic instability, the objective of this study was to assess whether RSI<1 can help to identify highrisk patients with potential shock and poor outcome, even though these patients do not yet meet the criteria for multidisciplinary trauma team activation (TTA). Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Taiwan. Participants: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 20 106 patients obtained from the trauma registry system of a level I trauma centre for trauma admissions from January 2009 through December 2014. Patients for whom a trauma team was not activated (regular patients) and who had RSI<1 were compared with regular patients with RSI=1. The ORs of the associated conditions and injuries were calculated with 95% CIs. Main outcome measures: In-hospital mortality. Results: Among regular patients with RSI<1, significantly more patients had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) =25 (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.62; p<0.001) and the mortality rate was also higher (2.1% vs 0.5%; OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.10 to 7.08; p<0.001) than in regular patients with RSI=1. The intensive care unit length of stay was longer in regular patients with RSI<1 than in regular patients with RSI=1. Conclusions: Among patients who did not reach the criteria for TTA, RSI<1 indicates a potentially worse outcome and a requirement for more attention and aggressive care in the emergency department.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976354749&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011072
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011072
M3 - 文章
C2 - 27329440
AN - SCOPUS:84976354749
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 6
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 6
M1 - e011072
ER -