Therapeutic benefits of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for depressive symptoms after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Yu Shian Cheng, Ping Tao Tseng, Yi Cheng Wu, Yu Kang Tu, Ching Kuan Wu, Chih Wei Hsu, Wei Te Lei, Dian Jeng Li, Tien Yu Chen, Brendon Stubbs, Andre F. Carvalho, Chih Sung Liang, Ta Chuan Yeh, Che Sheng Chu, Yen Wen Chen, Pao Yen Lin, Ming Kung Wu, Cheuk Kwan Sun*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Depression is a common morbidity after traumatic brain injury. This network meta-analysis investigated the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions for depression after traumatic brain injury. Methods: We extracted randomized controlled trials examining pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic interventions with placebo-or active-controlled designs from PubMed, the Cochrane Library and ScienceDirect, from inception to October 30, 2018. We based study selection and extraction of a pre-defined list of variables on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and con-ducted meta-analysis procedures using random effects modelling. Primary outcomes were changes in depressive symptom severity after pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic treatment; the secondary outcome was tolerability, reflected in overall patient dropout rates. Results: Our analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials (10 pharmacologic, total n = 483, mean age = 37.9 yr; 17 nonpharmacologic, total n = 1083, mean age = 38.0 yr) showed that methylphenidate had significantly superior efficacy compared to placebo or control (standardized mean difference –0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] –1.49 to –0.33). Sertraline was associated with significantly lower tolerability (i.e., a higher dropout rate) compared to placebo or control (odds ratio 2.65, 95% CI 1.27 to 5.54). No nonpharmacologic treatment was more effective than the others, and we found no significant differences in tolerability (i.e., dropout rates) among the non-pharmacologic treatments. Limitations: Heterogeneity in participant characteristics (e.g., comorbidities), study designs (e.g., trial dura-tion) and psychopathology assessment tools, as well as small trial numbers for some treatment arms, could have been confounders. Conclusion: The present network meta-analysis suggests that methylphenidate might be the best pharmacologic intervention for depressive symptoms related to traumatic brain injury. None of the nonpharmacologic interventions was associated with better improvement in depressive symptoms than the others or than control conditions. None of the pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic treatments had inferior tolerability compared to placebo or controls except for sertraline, which had significantly lower tolerability than placebo.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E196-E207
JournalJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Therapeutic benefits of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for depressive symptoms after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and network meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this