TY - JOUR
T1 - Training Session and Detraining Duration Affect Lower Limb Muscle Strength Maintenance in Middle-Aged and Older Adults
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Yang, Yong
AU - Chen, Shu Chen
AU - Chen, Chiao Nan
AU - Hsu, Chihw Wen
AU - Zhou, Wen Sheng
AU - Chien, Kuei Yu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Human Kinetics, Inc.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Muscle strength after detraining is still higher than the level before training, which is an important issue for middle-aged and older adults. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of detraining duration (DD), resistance training duration (RTD), and intensity on the maintenance of resistance training (RT) benefits after detraining in middle-aged and older adults. A systematic search yielded 15 randomized control trails (n = 383) eligible for inclusion. The results showed that RTD ≥ 24 weeks and DD ≥ RTD, the RT benefits were still significantly maintained even with medium and low intensity (standardized mean difference = 1.16, 95% confidence interval, CI [0.38, 1.94], p = .004). When RTD < 24 weeks and DD ≤ RTD, only the high-intensity groups maintained the RT benefits (DD, 4–6 weeks: standardized mean difference = 0.71, 95% CI [0.34, 1.08], p = .0002; DD 8–16 weeks: standardized mean difference = 1.35, 95% CI [0.66, 2.04], p = .0001). However, when DD > RTD, the RT benefits were not maintained even with high intensity. In summary, when RTD was less than 24 weeks, RTD > DD was an important factor in maintaining muscle strength.
AB - Muscle strength after detraining is still higher than the level before training, which is an important issue for middle-aged and older adults. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of detraining duration (DD), resistance training duration (RTD), and intensity on the maintenance of resistance training (RT) benefits after detraining in middle-aged and older adults. A systematic search yielded 15 randomized control trails (n = 383) eligible for inclusion. The results showed that RTD ≥ 24 weeks and DD ≥ RTD, the RT benefits were still significantly maintained even with medium and low intensity (standardized mean difference = 1.16, 95% confidence interval, CI [0.38, 1.94], p = .004). When RTD < 24 weeks and DD ≤ RTD, only the high-intensity groups maintained the RT benefits (DD, 4–6 weeks: standardized mean difference = 0.71, 95% CI [0.34, 1.08], p = .0002; DD 8–16 weeks: standardized mean difference = 1.35, 95% CI [0.66, 2.04], p = .0001). However, when DD > RTD, the RT benefits were not maintained even with high intensity. In summary, when RTD was less than 24 weeks, RTD > DD was an important factor in maintaining muscle strength.
KW - interrupted training
KW - muscle strength maintenance
KW - resistance training
KW - training intensity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131107151&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/japa.2020-0493
DO - 10.1123/japa.2020-0493
M3 - 文章
C2 - 34510028
AN - SCOPUS:85131107151
SN - 1063-8652
VL - 30
SP - 552
EP - 566
JO - Journal of Aging and Physical Activity
JF - Journal of Aging and Physical Activity
IS - 3
ER -