Using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to rate the certainty of evidence of study outcomes from systematic reviews: A quick tutorial

Shih Chieh Shao, Liang Tseng Kuo, Yen Ta Huang, Pei Chun Lai, Ching Chi Chi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework offers a structured approach to assess the certainty of evidence (CoE) in systematic reviews (SRs). The CoE for each outcome falls into one of the four categories: very low, low, moderate, or high. The judgment of CoE is based on five downgrading factors (including the risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision, and publication bias) and three upgrading factors (including large effect size, dose-response relationship, and opposing plausible residual bias and confounding). To improve the transparency of SRs, authors should indicate how they grade the CoE for each outcome and provide a rationale for downgrading or upgrading the CoE.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-7
Number of pages5
JournalDermatologica Sinica
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Dermatologica Sinica | Published by Wolters Kluwer ‑ Medknow.

Keywords

  • GRADE approach
  • meta-analysis
  • systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to rate the certainty of evidence of study outcomes from systematic reviews: A quick tutorial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this