Validation of the Chinese Version of Family-Professional Partnership Scale in Early Intervention

Lin Ju Kang*, Yu Wei Hsu, Ai Wen Hwang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Chinese version of the Family-Professional Partnership Scale (FPPS-C) measures satisfaction with mutually established parent-professional partnerships. This study aimed to evaluate the measurement properties of the FPPS-C Family and Professional Versions. The participants comprised 167 parents who had a child enrolled in an early intervention program, and 200 early intervention professionals in Taiwan. Structural validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and construct validity were examined. The Family Version denoted a single-dimensional scale with high internal consistency (α =.99) and adequate test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.54). The Professional Version showed a three-factor structure with moderate to adequate internal consistency (α =.64–.90) and test–retest reliabilities (ICC = 0.60–0.77). Construct validity was evidenced through positive associations between parental and professional perceptions on partnerships and to family-centered service provision. The FPPS-C is a reliable and valid measure, and the study findings can influence research initiatives and practices that aim to ameliorate the provision of family-centered services by early intervention programs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-395
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Early Intervention
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 12 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 SAGE Publications.

Keywords

  • cultural and linguistic diversity
  • early intervention
  • family-centered care
  • family-professional partnerships
  • reliability
  • validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the Chinese Version of Family-Professional Partnership Scale in Early Intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this