Vessel Size and Long-Term Outcomes after Limus-Based Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Focusing on Medium- and Small-Diameter Vessels

I. Chang Hsieh, Ming Jer Hsieh, Shang Hung Chang, Chao Yung Wang, Cheng Hung Lee, Chia Hung Yang, Dong Yi Chen, Ming Lung Tsai, Chun Chi Chen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of limus-based drug-eluting stent (DES) implanted in medium or small coronary vessels during a very long-term follow-up period. Methods: A total of 2383 patients treated with 2916 limus-based DES between April 2003 and March 2015 were evaluated. The enrolled patients were stratified into 3 groups according to the reference vessel diameter: group A: ≤2.5 mm; group B: 2.51 to 3.00 mm; group C: 3.01 to 3.50 mm. Results: Group A had a significantly higher loss index and binary restenosis rate than the other 2 groups at 9 months of angiographic follow-up. Group A also had a significantly higher rate of target lesion revascularization and a lower rate of major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival than the other 2 groups after a follow-up period of 68 ± 59 months. The long-term cardiovascular event-free survival curves based on a Cox regression model showed large vessel size, and second-generation DES had better outcomes. Conclusion: An inverse relationship between vessel size (≤3.5 mm) and clinical outcomes was noted in patients who received limus-based DES implantation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-541
Number of pages7
JournalAngiology
Volume68
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 07 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© SAGE Publications.

Keywords

  • limus-based eluting stent
  • long-term outcomes
  • vessel size

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vessel Size and Long-Term Outcomes after Limus-Based Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Focusing on Medium- and Small-Diameter Vessels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this