《全臺賦》編校之商榷--以曹敬賦為例

摘 要 本文乃以曹敬賦為範圍，討論《全臺賦》文本之轉錄，與其斷句、分段、 標點及校勘，所出現的問題。 本文檢覈《全臺賦》所收曹敬賦二十二篇，其斷句有問題的有五篇；未完 全切合題韻而分段的有七篇；因句式判斷有問題而影響標點的有二十篇五十八 處；文本載錄誤失有十三處；校勘可議的有兩處。依類逐一討論，旨在提醒《全 臺賦》的研究者，在處理文獻時，對類似的問題應有所措意，以免有所閃失， 造成結論的偏差；同時也希望在相關學理問題的討論上，發揮拋磚引玉的效應。
Abstract This article discusses Cao-Jing’s Fu in “The Whole Fu of Taiwan,” and points out some mistakes in punctuation and paragraphing. This research covers 22 works of Cao-Jing’s Fu and found out the following questionable sections, which include 5 works of incorrect punctuation, works of inappropriate paragraphing, and 58 sentences containing problematic punctuations. The purpose of this study is to remind researchers about similar problems and provide a basis for further discussion.