TY - JOUR
T1 - An international multicenter study of protocols for liver transplantation during a pandemic
T2 - A case for quadripartite equipoise
AU - Chew, Claire Alexandra
AU - Iyer, Shridhar Ganpathi
AU - Kow, Alfred Wei Chieh
AU - Madhavan, Krishnakumar
AU - Wong, Andrea Sze Teng
AU - Halazun, Karim J.
AU - Battula, Narendra
AU - Scalera, Irene
AU - Angelico, Roberta
AU - Farid, Shahid
AU - Buchholz, Bettina M.
AU - Rotellar, Fernando
AU - Chan, Albert Chi Yan
AU - Kim, Jong Man
AU - Wang, Chih Chi
AU - Pitchaimuthu, Maheswaran
AU - Reddy, Mettu Srinivas
AU - Soin, Arvinder Singh
AU - Derosas, Carlos
AU - Imventarza, Oscar
AU - Isaac, John
AU - Muiesan, Paolo
AU - Mirza, Darius F.
AU - Bonney, Glenn Kunnath
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Background & Aims: The outbreak of COVID-19 has vastly increased the operational burden on healthcare systems worldwide. For patients with end-stage liver failure, liver transplantation is the only option. However, the strain on intensive care facilities caused by the pandemic is a major concern. There is an urgent need for ethical frameworks to balance the need for liver transplantation against the availability of national resources. Methods: We performed an international multicenter study of transplant centers to understand the evolution of policies for transplant prioritization in response to the pandemic in March 2020. To describe the ethical tension arising in this setting, we propose a novel ethical framework, the quadripartite equipoise (QE) score, that is applicable to liver transplantation in the context of limited national resources. Results: Seventeen large- and medium-sized liver transplant centers from 12 countries across 4 continents participated. Ten centers opted to limit transplant activity in response to the pandemic, favoring a “sickest-first” approach. Conversely, some larger centers opted to continue routine transplant activity in order to balance waiting list mortality. To model these and other ethical tensions, we computed a QE score using 4 factors – recipient outcome, donor/graft safety, waiting list mortality and healthcare resources – for 7 countries. The fluctuation of the QE score over time accurately reflects the dynamic changes in the ethical tensions surrounding transplant activity in a pandemic. Conclusions: This four-dimensional model of quadripartite equipoise addresses the ethical tensions in the current pandemic. It serves as a universally applicable framework to guide regulation of transplant activity in response to the increasing burden on healthcare systems. Lay summary: There is an urgent need for ethical frameworks to balance the need for liver transplantation against the availability of national resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe a four-dimensional model of quadripartite equipoise that models these ethical tensions and can guide the regulation of transplant activity in response to the increasing burden on healthcare systems.
AB - Background & Aims: The outbreak of COVID-19 has vastly increased the operational burden on healthcare systems worldwide. For patients with end-stage liver failure, liver transplantation is the only option. However, the strain on intensive care facilities caused by the pandemic is a major concern. There is an urgent need for ethical frameworks to balance the need for liver transplantation against the availability of national resources. Methods: We performed an international multicenter study of transplant centers to understand the evolution of policies for transplant prioritization in response to the pandemic in March 2020. To describe the ethical tension arising in this setting, we propose a novel ethical framework, the quadripartite equipoise (QE) score, that is applicable to liver transplantation in the context of limited national resources. Results: Seventeen large- and medium-sized liver transplant centers from 12 countries across 4 continents participated. Ten centers opted to limit transplant activity in response to the pandemic, favoring a “sickest-first” approach. Conversely, some larger centers opted to continue routine transplant activity in order to balance waiting list mortality. To model these and other ethical tensions, we computed a QE score using 4 factors – recipient outcome, donor/graft safety, waiting list mortality and healthcare resources – for 7 countries. The fluctuation of the QE score over time accurately reflects the dynamic changes in the ethical tensions surrounding transplant activity in a pandemic. Conclusions: This four-dimensional model of quadripartite equipoise addresses the ethical tensions in the current pandemic. It serves as a universally applicable framework to guide regulation of transplant activity in response to the increasing burden on healthcare systems. Lay summary: There is an urgent need for ethical frameworks to balance the need for liver transplantation against the availability of national resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe a four-dimensional model of quadripartite equipoise that models these ethical tensions and can guide the regulation of transplant activity in response to the increasing burden on healthcare systems.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Equipoise
KW - Ethics
KW - Liver transplantation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85088649347
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.05.023
DO - 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.05.023
M3 - 文章
C2 - 32454041
AN - SCOPUS:85088649347
SN - 0168-8278
VL - 73
SP - 873
EP - 881
JO - Journal of Hepatology
JF - Journal of Hepatology
IS - 4
ER -