跳至主導覽 跳至搜尋 跳過主要內容

Andrology: Epididymal sperm aspiration with assisted reproductive techniques: Difference between congenital and acquired obstructive azoospermia?

  • C. S. Chen*
  • , S. H. Chu
  • , Y. K. Soong
  • , Y. M. Lai
  • *此作品的通信作者
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

研究成果: 期刊稿件文章同行評審

20 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

From July 1992 to May 1994, 31 cases of obstructive azoospermia-induced infertility underwent 35 epididymal sperm aspiration procedures and assisted reproductive techniques. These included in-vitro fertilization (IVF), zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT), subzonal insemination (SUZI) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with embryo transfer or tubal embryo transfer. The motile spermatozoa were retrieved using a gauge 24 Medicut cannula and flush medium. Total oocyte fertilization rate was 23.4% and the clinical pregnancy rate was 12.5% (four out of 32 treatment cycles). Congenital absence of the vas deferens was found in 16 cases (51.6%) and secondary genital duct obstruction was present in 15 cases (48.4%). In all, 29 aspirations were retrieved from the caput of the epididymis and six from the epididymal body or tail. The fertilization rate for the caput spermatozoa was much less than that for other areas of the epididymis (P < 0.05). Though there were no predictable differences in fertilization rates between the congenital and acquired groups, by using epididymal spermatozoa for assisted reproduction, the congenital group seemed to have a stronger tendency to achieve pregnancy (20 versus 5.9%).

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)1104-1108
頁數5
期刊Human Reproduction
10
發行號5
DOIs
出版狀態已出版 - 05 1995
對外發佈

指紋

深入研究「Andrology: Epididymal sperm aspiration with assisted reproductive techniques: Difference between congenital and acquired obstructive azoospermia?」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此