Augmented reality visualization for ultrasound-guided interventions: a pilot randomized crossover trial to assess trainee performance and cognitive load

Background: Augmented reality (AR) technology involving head-mounted displays (HMD) represents a significant innovation in medical education, particularly for training in guided invasive procedures. Novice physicians often face challenges in simultaneously identifying anatomical landmarks and performing procedures when learning point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Our primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of AR in enhancing physician training for ultrasound-guided interventions using AR visual overlays. The secondary objective was to compare cognitive load between traditional ultrasound training settings and AR-assisted training settings. Methods: This randomized crossover study, conducted from 2021 to 2022, compared performance and cognitive load of trainees attempting accurate central venous catheter (CVC) placement using an AR-HMD to display ultrasound images (AR-US), compared with standard ultrasound without visual overlay (S-US). We enrolled 47 trainees, including 22 final-year undergraduate medical students and 25 postgraduate physicians (years 1–4) from three hospitals in Taiwan. All participants had basic training in US-guided CVC placement but lacked AR-US experience. Performance and cognitive load were assessed using time measurements and NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), covering the dimensions of Mental-, Physical- and Temporal Demand, and Performance, Effort and Frustration. Results: We found AR technology reduced the time required for critical steps in CVC placement, while minimizing users’ neck strain. Female and junior trainees using AR-US identified anatomy and localized veins faster than those using S-US. Using AR-US, female trainees significantly outperformed males in anatomical identification [mean difference (MD): -10.79 s (95% CI: -2.37 to -19.21)]. The NASA-TLX cognitive load assessment showed mental workload trending lower in all dimensions except performance while using AR-US, compared to S-US. Similarly, junior trainees’ effort- and frustration scores were lower [MD: -2.73 (95% CI: -5.04 to -0.41) and -2.41 (95% CI: -4.51 to -0.31), respectively], as were female trainees’ effort scores [MD: -3.07 (95% CI: -6.10 to -0.03)] when using AR-US, compared to S-US, whereby these differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: AR technology helped improve trainee performance and reduced cognitive load during ultrasound-guided CVC placement. These findings support the application of AR technology to enhance physician training in ultrasound-guided interventional procedures, suggesting that AR-HMDs could be a valuable tool in medical education. Trial registration: The trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov on 20/09/2023 as a clinical trial, under the identifier NCT 06055400.