摘要
Background: This study investigated whether removal of a percutaneously inserted central venous catheter (PICC) is compulsory in neonates with bloodstream infection (BSI), and also examined the risk factors for infectious complications when a PICC is retained in these patients. Methods: This was a cohort study of neonates with a PICC who developed a BSI between 2001 and 2007. BSI was defined according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Results: Of the 234 neonates in the cohort, 99 had early removal of PICC (ER-PICC, defined as removal within 3 days after the onset of clinical sepsis), and 135 had late removal of PICC (LR-PICC, defined as retention for more than 3 days after the onset of clinical sepsis). Resolution of clinical sepsis within 2 days was more frequent in the ER-PICC group compared with the LR-PICC group (80.8% vs 57.8%; P <.001). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of infectious complications and case fatalities, but the LR-PICC group had a significantly higher incidence of recurrence within 1 month after BSI (P =.002). Inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment was the only variable independently associated with infectious complications (odds ratio, 11.4; 95% confidence interval, 3.34∼39.2; P <.001). Conclusions: PICCs should be removed in neonates with BSI, because retention of PICCs for more than 3 days is associated with delayed resolution of clinical sepsis and a higher incidence of recurrence within 1 month.
| 原文 | 英語 |
|---|---|
| 頁(從 - 到) | 59-64 |
| 頁數 | 6 |
| 期刊 | American Journal of Infection Control |
| 卷 | 40 |
| 發行號 | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| 出版狀態 | 已出版 - 02 2012 |
指紋
深入研究「Catheter management in neonates with bloodstream infection and a percutaneously inserted central venous catheter in situ: Removal or not?」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。引用此
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver