TY - JOUR
T1 - Classifying Alzheimer's disease and normal subjects using machine learning techniques and genetic-environmental features
AU - Huang, Yu Hua
AU - Chen, Yi Chun
AU - Ho, Wei Min
AU - Lee, Ren Guey
AU - Chung, Ren Hua
AU - Liu, Yu Li
AU - Chang, Pi Yueh
AU - Chang, Shih Cheng
AU - Wang, Chaung Wei
AU - Chung, Wen Hung
AU - Tsai, Shih Jen
AU - Kuo, Po Hsiu
AU - Lee, Yun Shien
AU - Hsiao, Chun Chieh
N1 - Copyright © 2023 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is complicated by multiple environmental and polygenetic factors. The accuracy of artificial neural networks (ANNs) incorporating the common factors for identifying AD has not been evaluated. Methods: A total of 184 probable AD patients and 3773 healthy individuals aged 65 and over were enrolled. AD-related genes (51 SNPs) and 8 environmental factors were selected as features for multilayer ANN modeling. Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine with RBF kernel (SVM) were also employed for comparison. Model results were verified using traditional statistics. Results: The ANN achieved high accuracy (0.98), sensitivity (0.95), and specificity (0.96) in the intrinsic test for AD classification. Excluding age and genetic data still yielded favorable results (accuracy: 0.97, sensitivity: 0.94, specificity: 0.96). The assigned weights to ANN features highlighted the importance of mental evaluation, years of education, and specific genetic variations (CASS4 rs7274581, PICALM rs3851179, and TOMM40 rs2075650) for AD classification. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed AUC values of 0.99 (intrinsic test), 0.60 (TWB-GWA), and 0.72 (CG-WGS), with slightly lower AUC values (0.96, 0.80, 0.52) when excluding age in ANN. The performance of the ANN model in AD classification was comparable to RF, SVM (linear kernel), and SVM (RBF kernel). Conclusion: The ANN model demonstrated good sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in AD classification. The top-weighted SNPs for AD prediction were CASS4 rs7274581, PICALM rs3851179, and TOMM40 rs2075650. The ANN model performed similarly to RF and SVM, indicating its capability to handle the complexity of AD as a disease entity.
AB - Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is complicated by multiple environmental and polygenetic factors. The accuracy of artificial neural networks (ANNs) incorporating the common factors for identifying AD has not been evaluated. Methods: A total of 184 probable AD patients and 3773 healthy individuals aged 65 and over were enrolled. AD-related genes (51 SNPs) and 8 environmental factors were selected as features for multilayer ANN modeling. Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine with RBF kernel (SVM) were also employed for comparison. Model results were verified using traditional statistics. Results: The ANN achieved high accuracy (0.98), sensitivity (0.95), and specificity (0.96) in the intrinsic test for AD classification. Excluding age and genetic data still yielded favorable results (accuracy: 0.97, sensitivity: 0.94, specificity: 0.96). The assigned weights to ANN features highlighted the importance of mental evaluation, years of education, and specific genetic variations (CASS4 rs7274581, PICALM rs3851179, and TOMM40 rs2075650) for AD classification. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed AUC values of 0.99 (intrinsic test), 0.60 (TWB-GWA), and 0.72 (CG-WGS), with slightly lower AUC values (0.96, 0.80, 0.52) when excluding age in ANN. The performance of the ANN model in AD classification was comparable to RF, SVM (linear kernel), and SVM (RBF kernel). Conclusion: The ANN model demonstrated good sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in AD classification. The top-weighted SNPs for AD prediction were CASS4 rs7274581, PICALM rs3851179, and TOMM40 rs2075650. The ANN model performed similarly to RF and SVM, indicating its capability to handle the complexity of AD as a disease entity.
KW - Alzheimer's disease
KW - Artificial neural networks (ANNs)
KW - Machine learning
KW - Single nucleotide polymorphisms
KW - Whole-genome genotyping
KW - Whole-genome sequencing
KW - Neural Networks, Computer
KW - Alzheimer Disease/genetics
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Support Vector Machine
KW - Machine Learning
KW - Gene-Environment Interaction
KW - Mitochondrial Precursor Protein Import Complex Proteins
KW - Case-Control Studies
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Female
KW - ROC Curve
KW - Aged
KW - Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85178584608
U2 - 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.10.021
DO - 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.10.021
M3 - 文章
C2 - 38044212
AN - SCOPUS:85178584608
SN - 0929-6646
VL - 123
SP - 701
EP - 709
JO - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
IS - 6
ER -