跳至主導覽 跳至搜尋 跳過主要內容

Classifying Alzheimer's disease and normal subjects using machine learning techniques and genetic-environmental features

  • Yu Hua Huang
  • , Yi Chun Chen
  • , Wei Min Ho
  • , Ren Guey Lee
  • , Ren Hua Chung
  • , Yu Li Liu
  • , Pi Yueh Chang
  • , Shih Cheng Chang
  • , Chaung Wei Wang
  • , Wen Hung Chung
  • , Shih Jen Tsai
  • , Po Hsiu Kuo
  • , Yun Shien Lee*
  • , Chun Chieh Hsiao*
  • *此作品的通信作者
  • Chang Gung University
  • National Taipei University of Technology
  • National Health Research Institutes Taiwan
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Veterans General Hospital-Taipei
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • National Taiwan University
  • Ming Chuan University
  • Lunghwa University of Science and Technology

研究成果: 期刊稿件文章同行評審

13 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is complicated by multiple environmental and polygenetic factors. The accuracy of artificial neural networks (ANNs) incorporating the common factors for identifying AD has not been evaluated. Methods: A total of 184 probable AD patients and 3773 healthy individuals aged 65 and over were enrolled. AD-related genes (51 SNPs) and 8 environmental factors were selected as features for multilayer ANN modeling. Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine with RBF kernel (SVM) were also employed for comparison. Model results were verified using traditional statistics. Results: The ANN achieved high accuracy (0.98), sensitivity (0.95), and specificity (0.96) in the intrinsic test for AD classification. Excluding age and genetic data still yielded favorable results (accuracy: 0.97, sensitivity: 0.94, specificity: 0.96). The assigned weights to ANN features highlighted the importance of mental evaluation, years of education, and specific genetic variations (CASS4 rs7274581, PICALM rs3851179, and TOMM40 rs2075650) for AD classification. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed AUC values of 0.99 (intrinsic test), 0.60 (TWB-GWA), and 0.72 (CG-WGS), with slightly lower AUC values (0.96, 0.80, 0.52) when excluding age in ANN. The performance of the ANN model in AD classification was comparable to RF, SVM (linear kernel), and SVM (RBF kernel). Conclusion: The ANN model demonstrated good sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in AD classification. The top-weighted SNPs for AD prediction were CASS4 rs7274581, PICALM rs3851179, and TOMM40 rs2075650. The ANN model performed similarly to RF and SVM, indicating its capability to handle the complexity of AD as a disease entity.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)701-709
頁數9
期刊Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
123
發行號6
DOIs
出版狀態已出版 - 06 2024
對外發佈

文獻附註

Copyright © 2023 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

指紋

深入研究「Classifying Alzheimer's disease and normal subjects using machine learning techniques and genetic-environmental features」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此