TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical outcomes for minimally invasive primary and secondary orbital reconstruction using an advanced synergistic combination of navigation and endoscopy
AU - Chen, Chien-Tsung
AU - Pan, Chun Hao
AU - Chen, Chih Hao
AU - Shyu, Victor Bong Han
AU - Wu, John Chung Han
AU - Kang, Gavin Chun Wui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Background Sequelae of inadequate orbital reconstruction include enophthalmos, hypoglobus, and diplopia. Accuracy of orbital reconstruction is largely subjective and especially difficult to achieve because of anatomic distortion in secondary or late reconstruction and in extensive injury. We combined computer navigation and endoscopy to perform accurate, aesthetic, and safe minimal-access primary and secondary orbital reconstruction. Methods From 2013 to 2014, 24 patients underwent unilateral primary and secondary or late minimally invasive orbital reconstruction with mainly Medpor and/or titanium mesh by navigation and endoscopic assistance through transantral, transconjunctival, or upper blepharoplasty approaches. Mean follow-up was 13.8 months (range, 6.2 months to 2.8 years). Results All orbital fractures were successfully reduced. Average enophthalmos among patients who underwent early reconstruction, late reconstruction, and multiorbital wall repair improved (p <.001) to 0.2 mm from 1.6, 2.6, and 2.6 mm, respectively. Hypoglobus and diplopia resolved in all. In early reconstruction patients, mean interorbital volume difference improved from 1.72 ± 0.87 to 0.53 ± 0.83 ml (P =.03). For late reconstruction patients, this difference improved from 3.41 ± 1.23 to 0.56 ± 0.96 ml (p <.001). There were no major complications during follow-up, and all were satisfied with their final appearance and function. Conclusion Navigation sharpens reconstructive accuracy and avoids injury to vital structures. Combined with endoscopic assistance for minimal-access reconstruction of wide-ranging orbital defects from primary to secondary or late cases and to extensive multiwall fractures, navigation facilitates minimal cosmetic incision and synergistic endoscope use and clearly optimizes aesthetic and functional outcomes, all with enhanced safety and unparalleled intraoperative visualization.
AB - Background Sequelae of inadequate orbital reconstruction include enophthalmos, hypoglobus, and diplopia. Accuracy of orbital reconstruction is largely subjective and especially difficult to achieve because of anatomic distortion in secondary or late reconstruction and in extensive injury. We combined computer navigation and endoscopy to perform accurate, aesthetic, and safe minimal-access primary and secondary orbital reconstruction. Methods From 2013 to 2014, 24 patients underwent unilateral primary and secondary or late minimally invasive orbital reconstruction with mainly Medpor and/or titanium mesh by navigation and endoscopic assistance through transantral, transconjunctival, or upper blepharoplasty approaches. Mean follow-up was 13.8 months (range, 6.2 months to 2.8 years). Results All orbital fractures were successfully reduced. Average enophthalmos among patients who underwent early reconstruction, late reconstruction, and multiorbital wall repair improved (p <.001) to 0.2 mm from 1.6, 2.6, and 2.6 mm, respectively. Hypoglobus and diplopia resolved in all. In early reconstruction patients, mean interorbital volume difference improved from 1.72 ± 0.87 to 0.53 ± 0.83 ml (P =.03). For late reconstruction patients, this difference improved from 3.41 ± 1.23 to 0.56 ± 0.96 ml (p <.001). There were no major complications during follow-up, and all were satisfied with their final appearance and function. Conclusion Navigation sharpens reconstructive accuracy and avoids injury to vital structures. Combined with endoscopic assistance for minimal-access reconstruction of wide-ranging orbital defects from primary to secondary or late cases and to extensive multiwall fractures, navigation facilitates minimal cosmetic incision and synergistic endoscope use and clearly optimizes aesthetic and functional outcomes, all with enhanced safety and unparalleled intraoperative visualization.
KW - Advanced technology
KW - Computer-assisted surgery
KW - Endoscopic image-guided surgery
KW - Minimally invasive surgery
KW - Primary and secondary traumatic orbit reconstruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029705334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.08.018
DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.08.018
M3 - 文章
C2 - 28958566
AN - SCOPUS:85029705334
SN - 1748-6815
VL - 71
SP - 90
EP - 100
JO - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
JF - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
IS - 1
ER -