跳至主導覽 跳至搜尋 跳過主要內容

Comparative study of Esophageal stent and feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy for tracheoesophageal fistula caused by esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

  • Yen Hao Chen
  • , Shau Hsuan Li*
  • , Yi Chun Chiu
  • , Hung I. Lu
  • , Cheng Hua Huang
  • , Kun Ming Rau
  • , Chien Ting Liu
  • *此作品的通信作者
  • Chang Gung University

研究成果: 期刊稿件 › 文章 › 同行評審

73 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Background: A malignant tracheoesophageal/bronchoesophageal fistula (TEF) is a life-threatening complication of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy had been the most common treatment method for patients with TEF before the era of stenting. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with TEF treated with an esophageal metallic stent to those treated with a feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 1011 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between 1996 and 2011 at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and 86 patients with TEF (8.5%) were identified. The overall survival and other clinical data were compared between 30 patients treated with an esophageal metallic stent and 35 patients treated with a feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy. Results: Among the 65 patients receiving either an esophageal metallic stent or a feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy, univariate analysis showed that treatment modality with an esophageal metallic stent (P = 0.007) and radiotherapy treatment after fistula diagnosis (P = 0.04) were predictive of superior overall survival. In the multivariate comparison, treatment modality with an esophageal metallic stent (P = 0.026, odds ratio: 1.859) represented the independent predictive factor of superior overall survival. There were no significant differences between groups in mean decrease in serum albumin or mean body weight loss. Compared to the feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy group, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the stenting group (53% versus 14%, P = 0.001) were able to receive chemotherapy within 30 days after fistula diagnosis, indicating better infection control in the stenting group. Conclusions: Compared with a feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy, an esophageal metallic stent significantly improves overall survival in patients with malignant TEF in our retrospective analysis. Esophageal metallic stent placement may be considered the first-line of treatment for patients with malignant TEF.

原文英語
文章編號e42766
期刊PLoS ONE
卷7
發行號8
DOIs
出版狀態已出版 - 13 08 2012

UN SDG

此研究成果有助於以下永續發展目標

  1. SDG3 健康與福祉
    SDG3 健康與福祉

指紋

深入研究「Comparative study of Esophageal stent and feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy for tracheoesophageal fistula caused by esophageal squamous cell carcinoma」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此