Comparing Innervated and Non-Innervated Glabrous Skin Flaps for Volar Digital Defects: Insights from Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background: Volar soft tissue defects in digits necessitate reconstructions that restore appearance sensation and minimize complications. This study compares innervated toe pulp (TP) and non-innervated medialis pedis (MP) flaps for reconstructing such defects, focusing on objective and subjective outcomes. Methods: Between 1998 and 2017, 101 free glabrous skin flap reconstructions were performed at our institution for volar digital soft tissue injuries, comprising 75 TP and 26 MP flaps. Follow-up assessments included the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, Foot and Ankle Disability Index, and sensory testing (static and moving two-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test). Data analysis utilized the Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: The study cohort included 29 participants (15 TP, 14 MP) with an average follow-up of 106 months. Functional and sensory outcomes revealed no significant differences between TP and MP flaps. Both flap types achieved satisfactory function and sensibility, with no statistically significant distinctions in patient-reported outcomes. Subjective complaints were similarly distributed across both groups, with a few reports of cold intolerance and discomfort at the donor site in the TP group. Conclusions: TP and MP flaps provide adequate coverage and sensory outcomes for volar digital defects without significant differences between innervated and non-innervated flap transfers. The flap choice should be tailored to individual patient needs and defect characteristics, emphasizing the importance of patient-centered decision-making in reconstructive surgery. Further research is required to explore the long-term outcomes of these reconstruction methods, especially for larger defects.