TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing the Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Teaching for Medical Students in Shared Decision-Making Communication Skills Training
AU - Lin, Yu Xuan
AU - Pham, Thi Ngoc
AU - Weng, Li Chueh
AU - Fang, Chun Kai
AU - Hsieh, Ming Ju
AU - Chang, Yu Che
AU - Fujimori, Maiko
AU - Tang, Woung Ru
N1 - © 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial in healthcare to facilitate effective communication between providers and patients, aiding in making optimal medical decisions. Communication skills training (CST) can improve physicians' ability in SDM. However, SDM CST for medical students in Taiwan is scarce, and research comparing online versus in-person CST outcomes is lacking.OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of online versus face-to-face SDM CST on medical students' decision-making proficiency and communication skills over time.DESIGN: This study employs a retrospective quasi-experimental design, analyzing 323 questionnaires from the CST training database.PARTICIPANTS: Participants (fourth-year medical students) were divided into two groups: face-to-face CST (n = 160) and online CST (n = 163).MAIN MEASURES: Assessments were conducted before (T0) and immediately after (T1) CST. Paired t-tests and generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate within-group and between-group differences in SDM decision-making proficiency and communication skills.KEY RESULTS: In the within-group comparison, both groups showed a significant improvement in SDM decision-making proficiency and communication skills. For SDM decision-making proficiency, the face-to-face group demonstrated a large effect (t = 12.9, p < 0.001, d = 0.87), and the online group achieved a moderate effect (t = 8.98, p < 0.001, d = 0.64). In terms of communication skills, both groups reached a moderate effect (face-to-face, t = 9.77, p < 0.001, d = 0.67; online, t = 8.00, p < 0.001, d = 0.54). No significant differences were found between groups in SDM decision-making proficiency and communication skills.CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that both online and face-to-face SDM CST effectively enhance the SDM decision-making proficiency and communication skills of medical students. The effectiveness of online CST is on par with face-to-face CST. It is recommended to use online CST when face-to-face classes are not feasible, especially during epidemics or budget constraints. Future research should explore the long-term impacts of these CST methods on students' skills, considering additional follow-up time points.
AB - BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial in healthcare to facilitate effective communication between providers and patients, aiding in making optimal medical decisions. Communication skills training (CST) can improve physicians' ability in SDM. However, SDM CST for medical students in Taiwan is scarce, and research comparing online versus in-person CST outcomes is lacking.OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of online versus face-to-face SDM CST on medical students' decision-making proficiency and communication skills over time.DESIGN: This study employs a retrospective quasi-experimental design, analyzing 323 questionnaires from the CST training database.PARTICIPANTS: Participants (fourth-year medical students) were divided into two groups: face-to-face CST (n = 160) and online CST (n = 163).MAIN MEASURES: Assessments were conducted before (T0) and immediately after (T1) CST. Paired t-tests and generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate within-group and between-group differences in SDM decision-making proficiency and communication skills.KEY RESULTS: In the within-group comparison, both groups showed a significant improvement in SDM decision-making proficiency and communication skills. For SDM decision-making proficiency, the face-to-face group demonstrated a large effect (t = 12.9, p < 0.001, d = 0.87), and the online group achieved a moderate effect (t = 8.98, p < 0.001, d = 0.64). In terms of communication skills, both groups reached a moderate effect (face-to-face, t = 9.77, p < 0.001, d = 0.67; online, t = 8.00, p < 0.001, d = 0.54). No significant differences were found between groups in SDM decision-making proficiency and communication skills.CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that both online and face-to-face SDM CST effectively enhance the SDM decision-making proficiency and communication skills of medical students. The effectiveness of online CST is on par with face-to-face CST. It is recommended to use online CST when face-to-face classes are not feasible, especially during epidemics or budget constraints. Future research should explore the long-term impacts of these CST methods on students' skills, considering additional follow-up time points.
KW - communication skills training
KW - medical education
KW - online teaching
KW - shared decision-making
KW - Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Physician-Patient Relations
KW - Young Adult
KW - Students, Medical/psychology
KW - Education, Distance/methods
KW - Decision Making, Shared
KW - Taiwan
KW - Female
KW - Adult
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Communication
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85212086072
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-024-09268-7
DO - 10.1007/s11606-024-09268-7
M3 - 文章
C2 - 39663341
AN - SCOPUS:85212086072
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 40
SP - 1403
EP - 1410
JO - JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
JF - JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
IS - 6
M1 - e0207012
ER -