跳至主導覽 跳至搜尋 跳過主要內容

Comparison of the efficacy of tropisetron versus a metoclopramide cocktail based on the intensity of cisplatin-induced emesis

  • Ting Chang Chang*
  • , Fushing Hsieh
  • , Chyong Huey Lai
  • , Chih Jen Tseng
  • , Huei Hsin Cheng
  • , Chia Lin Li
  • , Bullard J. Michael
  • , Yoong Kuei Soong
  • *此作品的通信作者
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • National Tsing Hua University
  • Chang Gung University

研究成果: 期刊稿件 › 文章 › 同行評審

12 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Cisplatin-induced emesis is one of the most feared side effects in cancer treatment. High-dose metoclopramide may prevent only 30-40% of cases of acute emesis. Investigations to test the efficacy of new antiemetics are mandatory. We compared the efficacy, toxicity, and patients' preference for tropisetron, a new 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (HT3) receptor antagonist, with those of a combination of high-dose metoclopramide, dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and lorazepam (metoclopramide cocktail) in a randomized crossover study for the control of nausea and vomiting during cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. A total of 62 chemotherapy-naive women were included and followed over 3 consecutive courses. Detailed analysis comparing the incidence of acute emesis for each 4 h period following cisplatin infusion was also performed. Complete protection from acute emesis was obtained in 48% of patients receiving tropisetron and 29% of patients receiving the metoclopramide cocktail over the first two courses of chemotherapy (P=0.029). When the frequency of acute emesis in all patients was compared on a daily basis, no significant difference was found. When emesis frequency was compared over each 4 h period following infusion of cisplatin, tropisetron was superior to the metoclopramide cocktail during the first, the second, and the first and second periods (P=0.0001, P=0.01 and P=0.0006, respectively). This superiority reversed after 12 h but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.112). Tropisetron was more effective in controlling acute nausea, but metoclopramide provided better control of delayed emesis. A drop in efficacy over successive courses was observed in patients receiving metoclopramide first but was not seen in tropisetron-first patients. A tendency for tropisetron preference was observed. Tropisetron is more effective than the metoclopramide cocktail in the control of chemotherapy-induced vomiting within 8 h of the implementation of cisplatin and in the control of nausea on the 1st day. To improve the control of chemotherapy-induced emesis, further investigations on the additional tropisetron dosing at 8 h after cisplatin infusion or the combination use of tropisetron and other antiemetics by a continuous 4 h period of observation and comparison are mandatory.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)279-285
頁數7
期刊Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
卷37
發行號3
DOIs
出版狀態已出版 - 05 1995
對外發佈是

UN SDG

此研究成果有助於以下永續發展目標

  1. SDG3 健康與福祉
    SDG3 健康與福祉

指紋

深入研究「Comparison of the efficacy of tropisetron versus a metoclopramide cocktail based on the intensity of cisplatin-induced emesis」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此