TY - JOUR
T1 - Conceptual design, optimization, and carbon emission analysis for the acrylonitrile/acetonitrile/water separation processes
AU - Yu, Bor Yih
AU - Ciou, Jao Wei
AU - Wu, Pei Jhen
AU - Wang, Gow Bin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - In this work, we firstly report on the rigorous design, optimization, and carbon emission analysis of the processes separating acrylonitrile (AN), acetonitrile (AC), and water. Two bi-sectional processes, which integrate heterogeneous extractive distillation with hybrid extraction-distillation (the HHED process), and that with pressure swing distillation (the HPSD process), are proposed. Compared with the existing configuration, operation using 30% less entrainer amount is found feasible for both processes, leading to 9.8% energy saving. Also, the optimized HHED process saves 4.8% total annual cost (TAC) and 5.8% carbon emission from the optimized HPSD process. Besides, implementing a vapor recompression cycle on the optimized HHED process reduces 31.1% CO2 emission but increases 6.6% of TAC. On the other hand, the heat-integrated HPSD process with an economizer design does not outperform the non-integrated HHED process. Finally, separation using heterogeneous azeotropic distillation or hybrid extraction-distillation process in single is conceptually rejected. Through this work, the industrial guidance could be provided.
AB - In this work, we firstly report on the rigorous design, optimization, and carbon emission analysis of the processes separating acrylonitrile (AN), acetonitrile (AC), and water. Two bi-sectional processes, which integrate heterogeneous extractive distillation with hybrid extraction-distillation (the HHED process), and that with pressure swing distillation (the HPSD process), are proposed. Compared with the existing configuration, operation using 30% less entrainer amount is found feasible for both processes, leading to 9.8% energy saving. Also, the optimized HHED process saves 4.8% total annual cost (TAC) and 5.8% carbon emission from the optimized HPSD process. Besides, implementing a vapor recompression cycle on the optimized HHED process reduces 31.1% CO2 emission but increases 6.6% of TAC. On the other hand, the heat-integrated HPSD process with an economizer design does not outperform the non-integrated HHED process. Finally, separation using heterogeneous azeotropic distillation or hybrid extraction-distillation process in single is conceptually rejected. Through this work, the industrial guidance could be provided.
KW - Acrylonitrile
KW - Carbon emission analysis
KW - Heterogeneous extractive distillation
KW - Hybrid extraction-distillation
KW - Simulated annealing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106368490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtice.2021.04.044
DO - 10.1016/j.jtice.2021.04.044
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85106368490
SN - 1876-1070
VL - 122
SP - 32
EP - 39
JO - Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
JF - Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
ER -