TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-leg free flaps for difficult cases of leg defects
T2 - Indications, pitfalls, and long-term results
AU - Chen, Hung Chi
AU - El-Gammal, Tarek Abdalla
AU - Wei, Fu Chan
AU - Chen, Hern Hsin
AU - Noordhoff, M. Samuel
AU - Tang, Yueh Bih
PY - 1997/9
Y1 - 1997/9
N2 - Background: Cross-leg free flaps have been described for reconstruction of leg defects in cases of trauma with no suitable recipient vessels in the vicinity of the defect. The pitfalls, however, have not been well documented in the literature. The technique of transfer and the length of time required before pedicle division depend on the nature of the flap and the contact surface. Methods: Eight cross-leg free flap reconstructions were performed on seven patients between 1986 and 1993. These included three latissimus dorsi muscle flaps, three fibula osteo-myocutaneous flaps, one tensor fascia lata myocutaneous flap, and one posterolateral thigh flap. The important technical considerations are outlined. Results: One latissimus dorsi flap failed, whereas the rest of the flaps completely survived. The morbidity of the recipient and donor sites are listed. Conclusion: We conclude that the technique offers the possibility of salvaging limbs that are, otherwise, nonreconstructable. It is useful for young patients. When the flap is long, it can function as a nutrient flap for the distal limb even though the pedicle has been divided. It is a backup procedure in an urgent situation of re-exploration in which reestablishment of circulation should take place as soon as possible.
AB - Background: Cross-leg free flaps have been described for reconstruction of leg defects in cases of trauma with no suitable recipient vessels in the vicinity of the defect. The pitfalls, however, have not been well documented in the literature. The technique of transfer and the length of time required before pedicle division depend on the nature of the flap and the contact surface. Methods: Eight cross-leg free flap reconstructions were performed on seven patients between 1986 and 1993. These included three latissimus dorsi muscle flaps, three fibula osteo-myocutaneous flaps, one tensor fascia lata myocutaneous flap, and one posterolateral thigh flap. The important technical considerations are outlined. Results: One latissimus dorsi flap failed, whereas the rest of the flaps completely survived. The morbidity of the recipient and donor sites are listed. Conclusion: We conclude that the technique offers the possibility of salvaging limbs that are, otherwise, nonreconstructable. It is useful for young patients. When the flap is long, it can function as a nutrient flap for the distal limb even though the pedicle has been divided. It is a backup procedure in an urgent situation of re-exploration in which reestablishment of circulation should take place as soon as possible.
KW - Cross-leg recipient vessels
KW - Extensive leg injuries
KW - Free flaps
KW - Neovascularization
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0030770544
U2 - 10.1097/00005373-199709000-00016
DO - 10.1097/00005373-199709000-00016
M3 - 文章
C2 - 9314312
AN - SCOPUS:0030770544
SN - 0022-5282
VL - 43
SP - 486
EP - 491
JO - Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
JF - Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
IS - 3
ER -