跳至主導覽 跳至搜尋 跳過主要內容

Current evidence and limitation of biomarkers for detecting sepsis and systemic infection

  • Shang Kai Hung
  • , Hao Min Lan
  • , Shih Tsung Han
  • , Chin Chieh Wu
  • , Kuan Fu Chen*
  • *此作品的通信作者
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Chang Gung University

研究成果: 期刊稿件文獻綜述同行評審

75 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Sepsis was recently redefined as a life-threatening disease involving organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Biomarkers play an important role in early detection, diagnosis, and prognostication. We reviewed six promising biomarkers for detecting sepsis and systemic infection, including C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), CD64, presepsin, and sTREM-1. Among the recent studies, we found the following risks of bias: only a few studies adopted the random or consecutive sampling strategy; extensive case-control analysis, which worsened the over-estimated performance; most of the studies used post hoc cutoff values; and heterogeneity with respect to the inclusion criteria, small sample sizes, and different quantitative synthesis methods applied in meta-analyses. We recommend that CD64 and presepsin should be considered as the most promising biomarkers for diagnosing sepsis. Future studies should enroll a larger sample size with a cohort rather than a case-control study design. A random or consecutive study design with a pre-specified laboratory threshold, consistent sampling timing, and an updated definition of sepsis will also increase the reliability of the studies. Further investigations of appropriate specimens, testing assays, and cutoff levels for specific biomarkers are also warranted.

原文英語
文章編號494
頁(從 - 到)1-15
頁數15
期刊Biomedicines
8
發行號11
DOIs
出版狀態已出版 - 11 2020

文獻附註

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

指紋

深入研究「Current evidence and limitation of biomarkers for detecting sepsis and systemic infection」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此