跳至主導覽 跳至搜尋 跳過主要內容

Efficacy and safety of entecavir versus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatic decompensation: A randomized, open-label study

  • Yun Fan Liaw*
  • , Maria Raptopoulou-Gigi
  • , Hugo Cheinquer
  • , Shiv Kumar Sarin
  • , Tawesak Tanwandee
  • , Nancy Leung
  • , Cheng Yuan Peng
  • , Robert P. Myers
  • , Robert S. Brown
  • , Lennox Jeffers
  • , Naoky Tsai
  • , Jolanta Bialkowska
  • , Shijie Tang
  • , Suzanne Beebe
  • , Elizabeth Cooney
  • *此作品的通信作者
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • G.B. Pant Hospital India
  • Mahidol University
  • Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital
  • China Medical University Taichung
  • University of Calgary
  • Columbia University
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
  • Medical University of Łódź
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb

研究成果: 期刊稿件 › 文章 › 同行評審

207 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

A randomized, open-label comparative study of entecavir versus adefovir therapy was performed in subjects with chronic hepatitis B who had hepatic decompensation (Child-Turcotte-Pugh score ≥7). Adult subjects were randomized and treated (n = 191) with entecavir 1.0 mg or adefovir 10 mg daily for up to 96 weeks from the date of last subject randomization. Subjects were positive or negative for hepatitis B e antigen and experienced or naive for treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean reduction in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, as determined by polymerase chain reaction, at week 24, adjusted for baseline HBV DNA and lamivudine resistance status by linear regression analysis. Entecavir demonstrated superiority to adefovir for this endpoint (treatment difference 1.74 log10 copies/mL [95% confidence interval -2.30, -1.18]; P < 0.0001). The entecavir group showed a greater change from baseline in HBV DNA at all time points through week 48 and a higher proportion of subjects who achieved HBV DNA < 300 copies/mL at weeks 24 (entecavir 49%; adefovir 16%; P < 0.0001) and 48 (entecavir 57%; adefovir 20%; P < 0.0001). Approximately two-thirds of subjects in both groups showed improvement/stabilization in Child-Turcotte-Pugh status. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score change at week 48 was -2.6 for entecavir and -1.7 for adefovir. Adverse event rates were comparable between groups. Cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma rates were 12% for entecavir and 20% for adefovir. Cumulative death rates were 23% for entecavir and 33% for adefovir. Week 24 mortality rates were 12% for both groups. Conclusion: Entecavir demonstrated superior virologic efficacy to adefovir in a population of patients with chronic hepatitis B who had hepatic decompensation. Biochemical and clinical benefits were also demonstrated. Entecavir was well tolerated, and early mortality rates were consistent with rates observed in similar populations treated with lamivudine.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)91-100
頁數10
期刊Hepatology
卷54
發行號1
DOIs
出版狀態已出版 - 07 2011

UN SDG

此研究成果有助於以下永續發展目標

  1. SDG3 健康與福祉
    SDG3 健康與福祉

指紋

深入研究「Efficacy and safety of entecavir versus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatic decompensation: A randomized, open-label study」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此