跳至主導覽 跳至搜尋 跳過主要內容

Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

  • Cheng Yu Tang
  • , Shih Hung Yang
  • , Chung Pin Li
  • , Yung Yeh Su
  • , Sz Chi Chiu
  • , Li Yuan Bai
  • , Yan Shen Shan
  • , Li Tzong Chen
  • , Shih Chang Chuang
  • , De Chuan Chan
  • , Chia Jui Yen
  • , Cheng Ming Peng
  • , Tai Jan Chiu
  • , Yen Yang Chen
  • , Jen Shi Chen
  • , Nai Jung Chiang*
  • , Wen Chi Chou*
  • *此作品的通信作者
  • Veterans General Hospital-Taipei
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • National Taiwan University
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • PharmaEngine, Inc
  • China Medical University Taichung
  • Kaohsiung Medical University
  • Triservice General Hospital Taiwan
  • Chung Shan Medical University
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Chang Gung University

研究成果: 期刊稿件 › 文章 › 同行評審

摘要

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study.

METHODS: In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018 to 2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, p < 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, p < 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (p = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, p = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, p = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)600-607
頁數8
期刊Pancreatology
卷24
發行號4
DOIs
出版狀態已出版 - 06 2024
對外發佈是

文獻附註

Copyright © 2024 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

UN SDG

此研究成果有助於以下永續發展目標

  1. SDG3 健康與福祉
    SDG3 健康與福祉

指紋

深入研究「Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此