TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic implications of single antiplatelet therapy in individuals developing diabetic foot disease with concurrent peripheral arterial disease
AU - Lin, Cheng Wei
AU - Huang, Yu Yao
AU - Lin, Chia Hung
AU - Huang, Chung Huei
AU - Hung, Shih Yuan
AU - Chen, I. Wen
AU - Chen, Yi Chia
AU - Liu, Pi Hua
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2026/12
Y1 - 2026/12
N2 - Background: Antiplatelet therapy is recommended for secondary prevention in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease (PAD), particularly after a diabetic foot event. Nevertheless, the relative effectiveness of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for long-term outcomes remains uncertain. Methods: Using the Taiwan Health and Welfare Data Center database, we identified 2,597 adults with type 2 diabetes who experienced their first diabetic foot disease (DFD) event with concurrent PAD between 2016 and 2019 and subsequently received a single antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention after stabilization. Outcomes included major lower extremity amputation (LEA), major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox proportional hazards and Fine–Gray competing risk models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution HRs (sHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Baseline characteristics indicated higher comorbidity burdens in the clopidogrel and cilostazol groups. After adjustment, the risks of LEA and MACE did not differ significantly among treatment groups. Compared with aspirin, cilostazol was associated with a higher risk of MALE (sHR 1.45 [95% CI 1.15–1.84]), whereas clopidogrel showed a nonsignificant trend (sHR 1.31 [95% CI 0.99–1.72]). Both cilostazol (HR 1.21 [95% CI 1.06–1.39]) and clopidogrel (HR 1.25 [95% CI 1.07–1.46]) were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed no significant mortality differences among dialysis patients, and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Conclusions: Among diabetic patients with PAD and a history of a foot event, aspirin was associated with comparable limb and cardiovascular outcomes, and potentially favorable survival, compared with clopidogrel or cilostazol. These observational findings suggest aspirin is a practical antiplatelet option for secondary prevention in this high-risk population, though further precise trials are needed to verify.
AB - Background: Antiplatelet therapy is recommended for secondary prevention in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease (PAD), particularly after a diabetic foot event. Nevertheless, the relative effectiveness of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for long-term outcomes remains uncertain. Methods: Using the Taiwan Health and Welfare Data Center database, we identified 2,597 adults with type 2 diabetes who experienced their first diabetic foot disease (DFD) event with concurrent PAD between 2016 and 2019 and subsequently received a single antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention after stabilization. Outcomes included major lower extremity amputation (LEA), major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox proportional hazards and Fine–Gray competing risk models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution HRs (sHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Baseline characteristics indicated higher comorbidity burdens in the clopidogrel and cilostazol groups. After adjustment, the risks of LEA and MACE did not differ significantly among treatment groups. Compared with aspirin, cilostazol was associated with a higher risk of MALE (sHR 1.45 [95% CI 1.15–1.84]), whereas clopidogrel showed a nonsignificant trend (sHR 1.31 [95% CI 0.99–1.72]). Both cilostazol (HR 1.21 [95% CI 1.06–1.39]) and clopidogrel (HR 1.25 [95% CI 1.07–1.46]) were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed no significant mortality differences among dialysis patients, and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Conclusions: Among diabetic patients with PAD and a history of a foot event, aspirin was associated with comparable limb and cardiovascular outcomes, and potentially favorable survival, compared with clopidogrel or cilostazol. These observational findings suggest aspirin is a practical antiplatelet option for secondary prevention in this high-risk population, though further precise trials are needed to verify.
KW - antiplatelet therapy
KW - Diabetic foot disease
KW - lower-extremity amputation
KW - major adverse cardiovascular event
KW - major adverse limb event
KW - peripheral arterial disease
KW - survival
KW - Prognosis
KW - Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Male
KW - Secondary Prevention/methods
KW - Female
KW - Cilostazol/therapeutic use
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications
KW - Proportional Hazards Models
KW - Aspirin/therapeutic use
KW - Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data
KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications
KW - Taiwan/epidemiology
KW - Clopidogrel/therapeutic use
KW - Diabetic Foot/epidemiology
KW - Aged
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035816339
U2 - 10.1080/07853890.2026.2653300
DO - 10.1080/07853890.2026.2653300
M3 - 文章
C2 - 41981998
AN - SCOPUS:105035816339
SN - 0785-3890
VL - 58
SP - 2653300
JO - Annals of Medicine
JF - Annals of Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 2653300
ER -