Similar efficacy and safety between lenvatinib versus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Chung Wei Su, Wei Teng, Po Ting Lin, Wen Juei Jeng, Kuei An Chen, Yi Chung Hsieh, Wei Ting Chen, Ming Mo Ho, Chia Hsun Hsieh, Ching Ting Wang, Pei Mei Chai, Chen Chun Lin*, Chun Yen Lin*, Shi Ming Lin*

*此作品的通信作者

研究成果: 期刊稿件文章同行評審

15 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Background: Lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab(A + B) have been used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as first-line therapy. Real-world studies comparison of efficacy and safety in these two regimens are limited, we therefore conduct this study to investigate these issues. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients received lenvatinib (n = 46) and A + B (n = 46) as first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC in a tertiary medical center. Objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed for baseline clinical features balance. Results: A total of 92 patients with median age of 63.8 year-old, 78.3% male, 85.9% viral hepatitis infected, 67.4% BCLC stage C were enrolled. The median treatment and follow-up duration were 4.7 months and 9.4 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in ORR (26.1% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.1226), PFS (5.9 vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.4066), and OS (not reached vs. not reached, p = 0.7128) between the lenvatinib and A + B groups. After IPW, the results of survival and response rate were also compared. Subgroup analysis suggested that using lenvatinib was not inferior to A + B in regards of PFS, including those with elder, Child-Pugh class B, beyond up-to-seven, or portal vein invasion VP4 patients. Among the lenvatinib treated patients, multivariate analysis showed patients elder than 65-year-old was an independent predictor associated with shorter PFS (adjust HR: 2.085[0.914–4.753], p = 0.0213). The incidence rates of adverse events were similar between two groups (76 vs. 63%, p = 0.1740). Both of two regimens had similarly few impact on liver function by comparison of baseline, third month, and sixth month albumin-bilirubin index and Child-Pugh score. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib are similar to A + B as a first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC.

原文英語
頁(從 - 到)7077-7089
頁數13
期刊Cancer Medicine
12
發行號6
DOIs
出版狀態已出版 - 03 2023

文獻附註

© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

指紋

深入研究「Similar efficacy and safety between lenvatinib versus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此