TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure of balance recovery confidence (BRC) for community-dwelling older adults
T2 - a study protocol
AU - Soh, Shawn Leng Hsien
AU - Lane, Judith
AU - Gleeson, Nigel
AU - Xu, Tianma
AU - Bte Abdul Rahman, Fahria
AU - Yeh, Ting Ting
AU - Soon, Benjamin
AU - Tan, Chee Wee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide clinicians a greater understanding of patients’ perceived ability in their physical performance. Existing PROMs on falls efficacy provide meaningful information about the perceived ability in older people to perform common activities of daily living without falling. However, the perceived ability to recover balance from a slip, a trip, or volitional movements has been inadequately assessed. Balance recovery confidence relates to the judgment of self-reactive ability. The scale of balance recovery confidence (BRC) is a new PROM that measures perceived balance recovery self-efficacy. The purpose of the study protocol is to describe the first psychometric evaluation of BRC’s measurement properties. Objective: This study is a validation phase of a newly developed PROM conducted in Singapore. Methods: Two hundred community-dwelling older adults, aged 65 years and older, will complete five self-reported instruments (BRC, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale-International, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument-Function and Global Perceived Effect) and three performance measures (Hand strength dynamometer, 30-second Chair Stand, Mini BESTest). Classical test theory methods will assess acceptability, data completeness, targeting of the items, scaling assumptions, internal consistency reliability and construct validity. Factor analysis will establish unidimensionality. Rasch analysis will evaluate item fit, differential item functioning, response scale ordering, targeting of persons and items and the reliability. Results: The findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences in rehabilitation-specific context. Conclusions: This is the first validation study of BRC. The study will give confidence among clinicians and researchers to use the BRC in fall management research and clinical practice.
AB - Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide clinicians a greater understanding of patients’ perceived ability in their physical performance. Existing PROMs on falls efficacy provide meaningful information about the perceived ability in older people to perform common activities of daily living without falling. However, the perceived ability to recover balance from a slip, a trip, or volitional movements has been inadequately assessed. Balance recovery confidence relates to the judgment of self-reactive ability. The scale of balance recovery confidence (BRC) is a new PROM that measures perceived balance recovery self-efficacy. The purpose of the study protocol is to describe the first psychometric evaluation of BRC’s measurement properties. Objective: This study is a validation phase of a newly developed PROM conducted in Singapore. Methods: Two hundred community-dwelling older adults, aged 65 years and older, will complete five self-reported instruments (BRC, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale-International, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument-Function and Global Perceived Effect) and three performance measures (Hand strength dynamometer, 30-second Chair Stand, Mini BESTest). Classical test theory methods will assess acceptability, data completeness, targeting of the items, scaling assumptions, internal consistency reliability and construct validity. Factor analysis will establish unidimensionality. Rasch analysis will evaluate item fit, differential item functioning, response scale ordering, targeting of persons and items and the reliability. Results: The findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences in rehabilitation-specific context. Conclusions: This is the first validation study of BRC. The study will give confidence among clinicians and researchers to use the BRC in fall management research and clinical practice.
KW - Accidental falls
KW - patient outcome assessment
KW - postural balance
KW - quality of reporting
KW - self-efficacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108181898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10833196.2021.1938867
DO - 10.1080/10833196.2021.1938867
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85108181898
SN - 1083-3196
VL - 26
SP - 457
EP - 466
JO - Physical Therapy Reviews
JF - Physical Therapy Reviews
IS - 6
ER -